|
| |
Savonius Wind Turbine
Soon to have an additional rotor on top, to bring the rotor
height up to 5'. This will increase the overall efficiency of the wind
turbine. The optimal height-to-width ratio is about 7:1. Currently
my design is 1' wide and 2' high with the additional rotor on top it will be 1'
wide by 5' high. This will increase my height-to-width ratio from 2:1 to
5:1.
See the Video of it spinning-
1.5MB MPEG
Rotors
- 3/8" x 3' All-Thread stainless-steel rod, supported by two greased ball
bearings in the base.
- Each rotor was constructed from 3" aluminum chimney pipe.
- Fastened to 1" block of wood using angle brackets.
- The overall dimension of the first rotor is 1' wide and 2' tall.
Base
- I designed the base to be heavy enough and strong enough to completely
support the rotor
- This eliminates the need for an upper support, which would reduce the
overall efficiency.
- Top and bottom plates were constructed from 1/4" pine laminate and 1"x2"
supports.
- The overall dimensions of the base - 10" high, 1' x 2' base.
- The weight of the base is heavy enough to prevent it from tipping in
strong winds.
Electronics
- Coming soon. Am considering two methods of generating the
electricity:
- Permanent magnet motor connected via pulleys/gears or create the generator
myself, using this method.
Savonius design basics
There are several variations of Savonius rotor. The efficiency of a
Savonius is only around 15 % but they are ideal for many situations. They
will start spinning with very little wind, produce a great amount of torque,
and need no speed limiter. The Savonius rotor is designed for low RPM
applications, and will never spin faster than the speed of the wind.
Some variations are shown below, looking down from the top of the turbine.
|
The
most basic design. It is very strong due to the central shaft, but slightly
less efficient than the other two. It is less efficient, because it does not
allow some of the air to be deflected onto the opposing rotor. |
This
design is also very simple, and can also be made easily from metal drums or
pipe sections. The design is slightly more efficient than the one above as
some of the air is deflected by the second vane as it exits the first one.
|
This is the most efficient Savonius design, and was the basis of my design.
It not only has the advantage of air being deflected twice like the design
above, but also that the vanes act partly like an airfoil when they are
edge-on into the wind, creating a small lift effect and thus enhancing
efficiency. This design is much more difficult to build, requiring vanes
rolled from metal sheet instead of being cut from drums or pipes. |
|